ttm002 is a digital synthesizer with a unique waveform synthesis engine and modulation mechanism.
ttm002 can generate arbitrary waveforms by adjusting the balance of four basic waveforms, and combinations of the four basic waveforms are provided as presets.
Instead of shaving the waveforms with a filter, as on most synthesizers, the phase of the generated waveforms can be varied over time to obtain an arbitrary timbre.
For final tone adjustment, a high-pass filter, low-pass filter, and chorus (scan vibrato) are provided.
Although it does not have a flashy sound that is very synthesizer-like, it can quickly approach the practical sound needed for a song. How to edit the basic waveform (with a text editor!) I hope to create preset data with you.
ttm002 can generate arbitrary waveforms by adjusting the balance of four basic waveforms, and combinations of the four basic waveforms are provided as presets.
Instead of shaving the waveforms with a filter, as on most synthesizers, the phase of the generated waveforms can be varied over time to obtain an arbitrary timbre.
For final tone adjustment, a high-pass filter, low-pass filter, and chorus (scan vibrato) are provided.
Although it does not have a flashy sound that is very synthesizer-like, it can quickly approach the practical sound needed for a song. How to edit the basic waveform (with a text editor!) I hope to create preset data with you.
- Generation of basic waveforms from nothing using a unique algorithm.
- Positive tone generation by our unique modulation mechanism.
- Practical sound generation with simple operations because it is focused on basic functions.
- Small memory usage and light load.
Downloads
Win 32 VST
(0 Mb)
Win 64 VST
(0.1 Mb)
(3 / 5)
The tone is so bad that you're not likely to use it. Not a bad plugin though. I like it. It's just a little bit more crappy sounding than it really needs to be.
Fixed a bug that caused freezing when releasing plug-ins. Ver. 1.01 https://www.kvraudio.com/product/ttm002-synth-a-by-ttm-works
(4 / 5)
I love the sound, and really like this simple interface, but it crashes, which is bad. I hope there will be fixes, I want to give it five stars. (I use Reaper 32 bit)
Thank you. I am in the process of debugging for the Ver 1.00 release.
I have a new version saved at the link, could you try this? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RZqPnanSSYUjtR7RZOz4BR-yh-4QgkeH/view?usp=sharing
Unfortunately this version freezes Reaper during plugins scanning stage.
I am using the 64-bit version of Reaper and it is working fine. Is Reaper a 32-bit version? If you don't mind, could you also tell me what your CPU is?
For me the beta version works, and stopped crashing :D Im using FL Studio 20
Computer exploded. Well, 64bit DLL on Win7/REAPER 64bit is instant crash while scanning. Aww.
Ver. 1.00 is released. I hope it will be cured here.
https://www.kvraudio.com/product/ttm002-synth-a-by-ttm-works
(5 / 5)
You deserve 5 stars. Can you make a tinny strings/violin/cello instrument for your next project? That would be nice.
Thank you very much. I am testing the possibilities of my idea of a sound source system with ttm002. If I can confirm that it produces a good sound, I will develop a plug-in optimized for each individual instrument like ttm000(Organ). I am also considering the possibilities of the violin sound.
I'll say this, but ttm's focus is on small, lightweight plugins. It's not about whether the interface is interesting or not, but about the quality, but he first tried and errored plug-ins to pursue how small the size was and how comfortable it was to be stress-free in terms of processing speed. Is being manufactured. It cannot be evaluated at this stage. This version is, so to speak, a test version. I think we can upgrade it in the future. Until then, let's wait patiently.
Yes, you are right about my commitment. Thanks for your understanding. I designed this synth to produce backing sounds when I produce my own music. I designed the interface to get the sound I want in the shortest amount of time possible based on my experience. The synth itself lacks features for me to enjoy it. If I want a sound that stands out, I know there are many other good synths out there, and I will choose those.
(5 / 5)
Oh yeah, I am soooo putting those 5 stars just to mess with the system... And the haters. ;-) This is a v0.01 of something that ~could~ be very fun once it matures. Don't get me wrong, it's missing a lot of features right now. But it's half-way to a KORG DW thing, with already a step up given it has more waveforms. But with a nice modulation matrix, some LFOs and ENVs to control the waveform Window and Balances, this would make this so much fun, and useful. A decent sub-osc would beef up the sound. Some different and wacky filter types would be welcomed. Keeping an eye on this one. That said, the 90s geocities website color scheme doesn't help... LOL
Are you the developer of this cheese?
ttm002 is developed based on the concept of limiting functions so that you can get to the sound you want with simple operations. I would like to develop the fun synth as a separate plug-in. I tried to make the colors easy to understand so that the operations would not be mistaken, but I may have a problem with my sense of style.
Thank you.
Don't worry too much about extras features in this plugin if you're going to make 'the fun one' ;-) That said, I must admit the letters used in the Level and Time sections are a bit... odd. The term AHDSR is way more common than APDSR, H for Hold. ISHE sounds quite unsual. I don't doubt someone would get accustomed to them, but I must say it will scare new users. If you're not married to them, may I suggest something like Begin, Sustain1, Sustain2, End. (so B, S1, S2, E) So many possibilities, I know. But I do believe it might be worth thinking of something more 'natural' to new haters... I meant users. ;-)
Okay. Let me know when your 64bit dll's will start working
Thank you. I will refer to the Time and Level names. I was wondering what kind of name I should use too.
>>DonnieDarkcore. Will 64-bit DLLs work? If so, can you tell me what Host you are using?
I just checked your ttm002 in 64bit right now and it works but I remember trying your ttm000 organ 64bit in the the past plus some other plugin and they didn't work. You got that tmm000 updated? I use a bunch of different DAW's. Btw. I don't hate on your ideas. The fact that they're so tinny in kb is actually pretty dope and I think it's definitely original. Umm,. ttm002 is not my cup of tea but I do like that ttm000 organ in 32 bit. Played around with it a couple times.
Read other people's reply properly
>>DonnieDarkcore. Thanks. I'm sure ttm000 has been improved and now runs the 64-bit version as well. You can try it if you like.
Thanks ttm. Just checked and they all work in 64 bit now. I apologize about my previous comment saying that your plugins are cheese. They are all neat plugins. Keep up the good work.
Thanks for the test. It was helpful because it is impossible for me to test on all DAWs by myself.
(3 / 5)
It's not obvious how I could use this but I feel like it deserves some serious playing with before making a final comment. I suspect there's more to it than leaps out at you.
ttm002 is designed to reproduce the sound of the backing support rather than the main melody. It lacks effectors on its own, so using your favorite effectors externally will give you a better experience. Thanks again.
(1 / 5)
Sounds terrible, like a home organ. I'm not saying this to annoy you. I just don't want to lie.
If someone wants to recreate a home organ, I would view this plug-in positively as a great success.
I just noticed that the 64-bit version is indeed noisier. I didn't notice it because I was testing mainly with the 32-bit version. I should not have been joking. I will investigate.
(3 / 5)
It is what it is. 1960s foreign film sounding... interesting change!
The demo is the theme song for a Japanese anime. I was allowed to use ttm002's ability to demonstrate natural instruments just for the sake of it.
(1 / 5)
sounds very basic, not impressed at all
I would also consider presets that sound impressive.
(1 / 5)
How can you offer such an ugly user interface that makes it not at all fun to continue to interact with the device. Sorry.
People are offering what they got.
You don't have to lie. Yes, the interface is terrible, I understand that. Now I have so many things I want to try instead of focusing on the interface that it would be difficult to improve it.
Nope. The UI is pleasantly simple and un-hysteric. Just perfect to stay concentrated on the main task and not spend too much time on superficiality.